<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s link: Command Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/googles-link-command-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/googles-link-command-revisited/</link>
	<description>The UK's Search Engine Marketing (SEM) Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:02:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/googles-link-command-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/?p=122#comment-778</guid>
		<description>The &#039;related:&#039; command will show some results from your site, but should only show a few of these. Like the &#039;link:&#039; command the results on this a re somewhat broken, but can provide some insight into how Google sees your site. If you mix the &#039;-site:&#039; command in with your &#039;related:&#039; search this will take out your site references, but will also break the results even more. However, as mentioned before this can give you some &#039;outside of the box&#039; insight in some ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;related:&#8217; command will show some results from your site, but should only show a few of these. Like the &#8216;link:&#8217; command the results on this a re somewhat broken, but can provide some insight into how Google sees your site. If you mix the &#8216;-site:&#8217; command in with your &#8216;related:&#8217; search this will take out your site references, but will also break the results even more. However, as mentioned before this can give you some &#8216;outside of the box&#8217; insight in some ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/googles-link-command-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>jackin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/?p=122#comment-772</guid>
		<description>When i use this related command it shows a  nice result but it also shows me the many inner pages of my website also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i use this related command it shows a  nice result but it also shows me the many inner pages of my website also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/googles-link-command-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/?p=122#comment-755</guid>
		<description>Hi Jackin,

To use the &#039;related:&#039; command you just need to type &#039;related:www.yourwebsite.com&#039; (obviously swap &#039;yourwebsite.com&#039; with you own site). Again, this is a pretty flaky set of results, but you can get a picture of what Google thinks you site is about. This is dictated by the content of your site, your inbound links and (importantly) your outbound links. So if a site links to a lot of unrelated sites, don&#039;t be surprised if Google starts to think that you are off topic, etc. I will do some check with this command and some other operators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jackin,</p>
<p>To use the &#8216;related:&#8217; command you just need to type &#8216;related:www.yourwebsite.com&#8217; (obviously swap &#8216;yourwebsite.com&#8217; with you own site). Again, this is a pretty flaky set of results, but you can get a picture of what Google thinks you site is about. This is dictated by the content of your site, your inbound links and (importantly) your outbound links. So if a site links to a lot of unrelated sites, don&#8217;t be surprised if Google starts to think that you are off topic, etc. I will do some check with this command and some other operators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackin mathis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/googles-link-command-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>jackin mathis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/?p=122#comment-745</guid>
		<description>What a great artilce and one thing like most and enjoy looking the results for this command - link:www.site.com -site:www.site.com.
But i am eager to know, like u told on article about related command but can u tell me how to use this command?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great artilce and one thing like most and enjoy looking the results for this command &#8211; link:www.site.com -site:www.site.com.<br />
But i am eager to know, like u told on article about related command but can u tell me how to use this command?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts on Google link: Command</title>
		<link>http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/googles-link-command-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts on Google link: Command</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk/?p=122#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[...] Cutts on Google link: CommandSearch Kingdom Word CloudGoogle&#039;s link: Command RevisitedUsing Google Search Operators For SEO?PageRank Sculpting Phase [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cutts on Google link: CommandSearch Kingdom Word CloudGoogle&#8217;s link: Command RevisitedUsing Google Search Operators For SEO?PageRank Sculpting Phase [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.286 seconds -->
